Voters told Taproot they want the next council to fix the relationship with the province
The growing responses to Taproot's listening work in the lead up to the municipal election on Oct. 20 reveal that voters are unsatisfied with the relationship between city council and the Alberta government, and they expect the next council to do better.
Earlier this year, Taproot launched our listening campaign at several in-person and virtual events, and we posted a 2025 election question on our site. We have been gathering responses ever since, and at last count, more than 900 people have provided them. The listening was built around a simple question: "What issues do you care about as you consider who to vote for in the 2025 municipal election, and why?"
Almost 100 people answered this by saying the city needs a council that can get more support from the province. The overwhelming majority of these respondents criticized the United Conservative Party government for its role in the relationship, using terms such as "interfering," "intervening," "meddling," "overreaching," "encroaching," or "intruding" when pointing to things like bike lanes and the election process.
"While, constitutionally, municipalities are creatures of the provincial government, there is a lot to be said about staying in your own lane and working collaboratively together," one respondent said. "The province has gutted municipalities' control on many fronts: Photo radar, speeding, policing, appointments to the police commission, political parties, spending at the municipal level, and so on."
A few respondents said the city should butt out of work that's a provincial responsibility, though far more said Edmonton's city council must step up if the province doesn't. "I want a candidate that doesn't get too tangled up in municipal jurisdiction, and invests in housing and other solutions despite it being a provincial responsibility," one respondent said.
Many said the province has not done enough for Edmonton when it comes to money or action to tend to health, homelessness, and housing. "Homelessness is a big issue that needs to be addressed. It falls under (provincial jurisdiction), but the cities are stuck with it," one person said.
A small group of respondents said the current council has not been diplomatic enough with the province. "The tone taken by the current council has been combative and childish," one said. Most others said the next council should unapologetically advocate for the city's best interests, however.
Regardless of their stance on who needs to do better in the relationship, the vast majority expressed fatigue with the relationship not working for Edmonton. Many told us they just want the perceived adversarial dynamic to end. "I really wish the provincial and municipal governments would stop blaming each other and finally agree to work together on long-term solutions, including to address the root cause of houselessness and addiction," one said.
One person wondered what would happen if the next council pursued a short wish list from the province. "What are the top three concerns the candidates would communicate to the provincial government, and what are the candidates' proposed solutions?" they asked.
Taproot has worked to explain some of the key points in city council's relationship with the province since being elected in 2021.